Comments on: A Limit Hand Taken From Online Poker http://www.pokerdoom.com/poker-articles/a-limit-hand-taken-from-online-poker Mon, 03 May 2010 11:24:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Poker Doom http://www.pokerdoom.com/poker-articles/a-limit-hand-taken-from-online-poker/comment-page-1#comment-104 Poker Doom Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:41:48 +0000 http://www.pokerdoom.com/?p=562#comment-104 Judy, Action was never completed on the turn. As a result, the river card does not count. The players get their river bet back and the river card is taken off of the board. Depending on where the player that did not act is located in action will determine what happens next. For the sake of argument, I will assume she was between the bettor and caller on the turn. What happens next is that caller get to take his bet back until the player that did not act makes her action. Once she completes her action, then the player that called may act. After the turn action is completed, the river card that was originally dealt is put back into the deck, shuffled, and another river card is dealt. At this point, action continues as normal. The only variation that I have seen on the above is that the player that called on the turn may be forced to keep his call in the pot if the player that did not act elects to fold. This is a clear case of the dealer not paying attention to the action. In most games, this would be an honest mistake. However, if the player does this and other suspicious activities, call the floor. /James Judy,
Action was never completed on the turn. As a result, the river card does not count. The players get their river bet back and the river card is taken off of the board. Depending on where the player that did not act is located in action will determine what happens next. For the sake of argument, I will assume she was between the bettor and caller on the turn. What happens next is that caller get to take his bet back until the player that did not act makes her action. Once she completes her action, then the player that called may act. After the turn action is completed, the river card that was originally dealt is put back into the deck, shuffled, and another river card is dealt. At this point, action continues as normal.

The only variation that I have seen on the above is that the player that called on the turn may be forced to keep his call in the pot if the player that did not act elects to fold.

This is a clear case of the dealer not paying attention to the action. In most games, this would be an honest mistake. However, if the player does this and other suspicious activities, call the floor.

/James

]]> By: Judy Heinig http://www.pokerdoom.com/poker-articles/a-limit-hand-taken-from-online-poker/comment-page-1#comment-103 Judy Heinig Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:33:17 +0000 http://www.pokerdoom.com/?p=562#comment-103 Not a comment, but a question. I was involved in a hand where a player did not call the bet on the turn and did not fold (she was involved in a conversation). The dealer missed the fact that she did not call or fold and dealt the river card. A bet was made. Now the player engaged in the conversation calls the bet and wins the hand. The player that lost the hand objects and says her hand should have been mucked because she did not call the bet on the turn. What is correct? Not a comment, but a question. I was involved in a hand where a player did not call the bet on the turn and did not fold (she was involved in a conversation). The dealer missed the fact that she did not call or fold and dealt the river card. A bet was made. Now the player engaged in the conversation calls the bet and wins the hand. The player that lost the hand objects and says her hand should have been mucked because she did not call the bet on the turn. What is correct?

]]>