<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PokerDoom.com &#187; tells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokerdoom.com/tag/tells/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokerdoom.com</link>
	<description>Online Poker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Supersystem examined     part one</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerdoom.com/poker-articles/supersystem-examined-part-one</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokerdoom.com/poker-articles/supersystem-examined-part-one#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poker Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holdem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerdoom.com/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one and only Doyle Brunson is perhaps the most universally known of all poker players. Even amongst non poker players, the name Doyle Brunson is still known and that speaks volumes about a man that is more than just a poker player, he is also an icon. Brunson is a true living poker legend [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one and only <strong>Doyle Brunson</strong> is perhaps the most universally known of all <strong>poker players</strong>. Even amongst non <strong>poker players</strong>, the name <strong>Doyle Brunson </strong>is still known and that speaks volumes about a man that is more than just a <strong>poker</strong> player, he is also an icon. Brunson is a true living poker legend and that legend began back in 1976 when he captured his first WSOP world title at the famous <strong>Binions Horseshoe Casino</strong>.</p>
<p>But what established Brunson in the public eye was a combination of two further factors. The first being his second world title success the following year in 1977 when he strangely won the title again while holding the same hand (10-2) and making a <strong>full house </strong>with it on both final hands in 1976 and 1977.</p>
<p>But I think that another hugely contributing factor towards the fame that Brunson enjoys now was the launch in 1978 of the book that went onto achieve legendary status amongst <strong>poker books</strong>.</p>
<p>That book was called <strong>Supersystem</strong> or as many people are unaware, How I made over $1,000,000 playing poker which was its original title before it actually became known as <strong>Supersystem</strong>. This was a hugely adventurous book to attempt to compile at the time, in fact the sheer size of the book to anyone who has ever seen it is still very impressive even now…..a full thirty years later.</p>
<p>But for me, the most distinguishing features of the book was the sheer ground breaking knowledge that was incorporated into Brunson’s section on no limit <a title="Play Texas Hold’em poker online at bwin.com" href="https://poker.bwin.com/poker.aspx?content=texasholdem">Texas Holdem</a> and the fact that he had somehow managed to gather five of the top <strong>poker</strong> minds in the world to help him compile the book.</p>
<p>Non other than the then reigning world champion <strong>Bobby Baldwin</strong>, <strong>David “Chip” Reese</strong> who went onto to become arguably the greatest poker player who ever lived, David Sklansky who is perhaps the foremost poker theorist in the world, <strong>Mike Caro</strong> and Joey Hawthorne.</p>
<p>Even the legendary <strong>Amarillo Slim</strong> wrote the preface for the book so Supersystem was literally compiled by the who’s who of the poker world at that time. But it was the sheer power of the information that Brunson packed into his section on <strong>no limit hold’em</strong> that had the entire poker world talking for years to follow.</p>
<p>Brunson’s associates were also writing excellent sections on <strong>Draw Poker</strong>,<strong> Seven Card Stud</strong>, Lowball, High Low Split and <strong>Limit Hold’em </strong>in the book. However as the years have progressed, much of the information in many of those sections is now out of date.</p>
<p>For instance the blind structure in the limit games has changed and the split games now use a qualifier for low and <strong>Draw poker</strong> is rarely played these days.</p>
<p>But despite that, the quality of the information inside this one <strong>poker </strong>book has led to various people quoting all sorts of superlatives with regards the book. Words like “great”, “ground breaking”, “legendary”, “unique” and “the poker bible” have been used frequently and in this particular case were well deserved. Look out for part two of this multi-part series.</p>
<p><strong>Carl “The Dean” Sampson </strong></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokerdoom.com/poker-articles/supersystem-examined-part-one/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Forgetting Makes Sense?</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/does-forgetting-make-sense</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/does-forgetting-make-sense#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poker Doom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Texas Holdem FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drop out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folded hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forgetting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tilt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerdoom.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My question is something about forgetting the card I hold to prevent tilt. Once, I was playing with a few friends and I am on the button. I noticed that there were a lot of actions around before I&#8217;m up. When my turn arrived, I slowly looked at my hole and surprisingly I&#8217;ve seen two-seven [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is something about forgetting the card I hold to prevent tilt.</p>
<p>Once, I was playing with a few friends and I am on the button. I noticed that there were a lot of actions around before I&#8217;m up. When my turn arrived, I slowly looked at my hole and surprisingly I&#8217;ve seen two-seven off suit. As a result, I immediately folded.</p>
<p>To make the long story short, the flop came up two sevens and a deuce. The guy in the table who was picking pair of kings since the start of the game, won for having kings up.</p>
<p>Well, I needed a quick break after that incident. But eventually my sort of a break didn&#8217;t last for long as I&#8217;ve returned  to my old, calm self in just a short time.</p>
<p>My question now is:</p>
<p>Does forgetting your folded hands really make sense? And that if you drop out early, can you really look for some tells?</p>
<p>Any response from you will be appreciated. Thanks!</p>
<p>JR<br />
<em><strong> JR,</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>Once you fold a hand, the best thing to do is to wait for the next hand and not worry about what might have been.  You can’t change the past.  The best thing to do is forget about the fold.  If you played well, take solice in the fact that you played well. </strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>If you drop out of the hand early, you can use the time to pick up information on other players.  There is nothing wrong with that.  In fact that will help you to forget about the cards that you folded.</strong></em></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/does-forgetting-make-sense/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What About Poker Tells?</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/what-about-poker-tells</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/what-about-poker-tells#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poker Doom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Texas Holdem FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first three community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-flop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerdoom.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there! I&#8217;ve been checking a lot of websites for some time now, and as of this moment, it&#8217;s your site I think is the most interesting. Well, the reason why I&#8217;ve been looking for the top dog site supposedly, is all because I wanted to find some significant information about tells that take place [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been checking a lot of websites for some time now, and as of this moment, it&#8217;s your site I think is the most interesting.</p>
<p>Well, the reason why I&#8217;ve been looking for the top dog site supposedly, is all because I wanted to find some significant information about tells that take place before the first three community have been dealt.</p>
<p>Fortunately, by going over on some sites, I&#8217;ve learned that the time spent looking at pocket cards can be a tell, but I&#8217;ve also learned that it could also imply something else. That when you look for a longer time than the usual, it signifies nothing else but poor cards trying to act strong.</p>
<p>Any advise, info or the like about tells or even pre-flop? Thanks in advance!</p>
<p>Lance<br />
<em><strong> Lance,</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>Someone that looks at their cards and then glances at their chips or at yours usually has a strong hand.  Someone that looks at their hand and looks around to check their position is usually playing an inferior hand.  Someone that looks at their cards and then intently watches all action or leans in to check out the action will usually have a strong hand.  If they look at their hand and then start checking out the tv, looking around, etc, they will probably fold.  If they look at their hand and start talking to their neighbor, they are probably going to fold too.</strong></em></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/what-about-poker-tells/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Caro&#8217;s Book of Poker Tells Reliable?</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/is-caros-book-of-poker-tells-reliable</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/is-caros-book-of-poker-tells-reliable#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poker Doom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Texas Holdem FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annie Duke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caro's Book of Poker Tells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false tells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Lederer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pray tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerdoom.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t exactly believe why pray tell, just like what one of your visitors have said. Any comment about it? By the way, I&#8217;ve memorized Caro&#8217;s Book of Poker Tells. I understand that you have nothing to do with it, but I&#8217;m wondering if it&#8217;s something really reliable. Any feedback will be much appreciated. Thank [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t exactly believe why pray tell, just like what one of your visitors have said. Any comment about it?</p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;ve memorized Caro&#8217;s Book of Poker Tells. I understand that you have nothing to do with it, but I&#8217;m wondering if it&#8217;s something really reliable.</p>
<p>Any feedback will be much appreciated.</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Ram<br />
<em><strong> Ram,</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>Yes, his book is very reliable, but also realize that some people may use these tells against you too.  These are known as false tells.  Howard Lederer has a DVD about tells as well that I think you should look at.  Annie Duke in her set of DVD’s goes over tells as well and I know for a fact that the advice is solid as a few days after watching, I was able to spot a couple of the tells she mentioned and won a big pot in a tournament.</strong></em></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokerdoom.com/texas-holdem-faq/is-caros-book-of-poker-tells-reliable/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

