For some time now, something has been bothering me. It has actually something to do with what happened to me at a regular game where in the big blind haven’t had enough to cover the blinds.

Let us just put this way, the blinds were at 75/150 and the big blind only has 50. I’m wondering, do you think he is entitled to win the blinds though he doesn’t have enough? Or rather, he can just win the amount he had since the beginning?

Personally, I believe he should only win the amount he had in the first place. But I’m not so sure about this. Any advice for me?

Thank you.

Roan
Roan,

The big blind could only win up to the amount he has in front of him. The player in the small blind would get back 25 and they would play for the 100 chip pot. At no time can a player win more from a single player than they have in front of them.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.